GM, Segway, The Puma, And The U.S. Government
News today: GM (NYSE: GM) is about to show off a new vehicle it has produced in cooperation with Segway Inc., maker of the upright, self-balancing scooters. It is a new type of two-wheeled vehicle designed to move easily through congested urban streets. Very cool. Innovative. It’s called called “PUMA,” for Personal Urban Mobility and Accessibility. Here’s what it looks like:

But I wonder, to what degree does GM have to get permission from the White House as it rolls-out this strategy? Did they review their promotional plans for how they are going to show off this new product in New York today?
We know two things that are relevant here. First, if the White House doesn’t approve of management decisions, they will cite the fact that GM has so much taxpayer money that the government has the right to show management to the door. We also know that the US government believes that the nation’s energy policy in the future depends on GM and other auto manufacturers pursuing alternative fuel cars. Is the PUMA ”alternative” enough? My guess is yes. But if you were the CEO of GM, and you wanted to keep your job and not be fired by White House officials, how would you know for sure? Does GM have to ask the government whether the Segway venture is strategy that the government approves of before they enter into the venture? What if the government doesn’t agree with that strategy for whatever reason? Maybe that isn’t the strategy the White House wants. Maybe it is. Who knows for sure?
In normal circumstances, GM management would bring the idea of its new venture to its Board, which oversees management and strategy. OK. It’s already been decided that whoever it is in the White House who makes decisions about GM strategy doesn’t think too much of the GM board. So, what does GM management do?
Well, this one is kind of easy. The PUMA looks like it is a direct fit with the Obama administration’s auto philosophy. But let’s say that GM’s consumer research department brings a report to the CEO. “Hey boss. You might not believe this. But we are seeing a real trend among adult women that they want big gas guzzlers. We have all the rationale right here in our research. Take a look. It’s a little hard to believe but the demand is absolutely there.” Granted that this example is an extreme, but it makes a point. If you were the CEO and the Board of GM, you have a fiduciary obligation to your investors to make decisions that will translate into greater value for their investment. And here’s a real opportunity to sell some high priced cars in pretty good volume and drive some earnings to the bottom line. But you also know that if you launch a gas guzzler you are going to irk the White House people who are overseeing you. They don’t like gas guzzlers. If you approve a new gas guzzler model you will serve your investors but risk being fired. What do you do?




Its dumb to think the strategy that did GM in over three decades wstill has some traction regardless of which lunatic brings what ppt to impress you..
Its shocking that not-invented-here syndrom could be so powerful.. Its is mind-boggling to think that people can be so myopic and not see what is staring in th face as GM and teh rest of the Detroit cohort have been.. In the past 25 years I have leased 25 vehicles and I have gone to check out the Det3 as well and never could manage to put my money on them.. why? Does that explain something?? When the only reason one wants to buy a Det3 is patriotism, it won’t be long before it has to be resuscitated with “patriotic” or government funds.. let us ask them to understadn what the customers want.. find those who know how to understand that..
Love this product – what GM could have been doing years ago, smart collaborations like this. Just like any organization, GM management now needs to ‘manage up’ – in this case, to the Obama Administration. But they shouldn’t complain because they had to see this coming. Any real or significant capital investment in research or launch should definitely be put in front of the Administration for review – hell if Obama was savvy enough to take out the CEO, he is savvy enough to know that he can’t run the company but can cause them to think differently.