<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;New Media&#8221; Gurus Are Creating A Third Basic Flaw In The Communications Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deathoftime.com/2009/03/23/new-media-gurus-are-creating-a-third-basic-flaw-in-the-communications-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deathoftime.com/2009/03/23/new-media-gurus-are-creating-a-third-basic-flaw-in-the-communications-business/</link>
	<description>Thoughts of a Communicator About a World in Transition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:31:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Trenn</title>
		<link>http://www.deathoftime.com/2009/03/23/new-media-gurus-are-creating-a-third-basic-flaw-in-the-communications-business/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Trenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deathoftime.com/?p=735#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Doug

You&#039;re not making your case.  You&#039;re saying that &quot;new media&quot;, while useful is an &quot;over-exaggerated tool&quot;.  And the proof of this is the need for communications agencies to, in the future, produce very compelling  content regardless of the distribution channel.

I disagree.  I see what I call social media as something that is changing the foundations of marketing communications.  It&#039;s far beyond being a tool.  

To me, it seems, you&#039;ve concentrated too much on the actual tools of social media and perhaps listened too much to the wrong advocates in your three month hiatus.

Once you get through the hype, you see with clarity what social media means and what its impact is.

You&#039;ve inspired me to go back and begin writing the short &quot;e-book&quot; that I&#039;ve been planning to write regarding how many in social media fail to apply business principles.  In the meantime, I&#039;ve blogged about your views on the first two flaws here:  http://digitalstreetjournal.com/wordpress/?p=307   And I&#039;ve challenged your above views here:  http://digitalstreetjournal.com/wordpress/?p=316

I enjoy reading your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not making your case.  You&#8217;re saying that &#8220;new media&#8221;, while useful is an &#8220;over-exaggerated tool&#8221;.  And the proof of this is the need for communications agencies to, in the future, produce very compelling  content regardless of the distribution channel.</p>
<p>I disagree.  I see what I call social media as something that is changing the foundations of marketing communications.  It&#8217;s far beyond being a tool.  </p>
<p>To me, it seems, you&#8217;ve concentrated too much on the actual tools of social media and perhaps listened too much to the wrong advocates in your three month hiatus.</p>
<p>Once you get through the hype, you see with clarity what social media means and what its impact is.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve inspired me to go back and begin writing the short &#8220;e-book&#8221; that I&#8217;ve been planning to write regarding how many in social media fail to apply business principles.  In the meantime, I&#8217;ve blogged about your views on the first two flaws here:  <a href="http://digitalstreetjournal.com/wordpress/?p=307" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://digitalstreetjournal.com/wordpress/?p=307');" rel="nofollow">http://digitalstreetjournal.com/wordpress/?p=307</a>   And I&#8217;ve challenged your above views here:  <a href="http://digitalstreetjournal.com/wordpress/?p=316" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://digitalstreetjournal.com/wordpress/?p=316');" rel="nofollow">http://digitalstreetjournal.com/wordpress/?p=316</a></p>
<p>I enjoy reading your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social media: not a tool nor a flaw, but a fundamental change - Digital Street Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.deathoftime.com/2009/03/23/new-media-gurus-are-creating-a-third-basic-flaw-in-the-communications-business/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Social media: not a tool nor a flaw, but a fundamental change - Digital Street Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deathoftime.com/?p=735#comment-304</guid>
		<description>[...] a fundamental change  Apr.17, 2009 in Uncategorized  In my last post, I discussed the points that Qorvis&#8217; Doug Poretz has raised regarding what he sees at two of the three major flaws of the marketing communications [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a fundamental change  Apr.17, 2009 in Uncategorized  In my last post, I discussed the points that Qorvis&#8217; Doug Poretz has raised regarding what he sees at two of the three major flaws of the marketing communications [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

